Talk:Agricultural show

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Agricultural show is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Agricultural show was copied or moved into Sykehouse with this edit on 10 August 2014. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Comment

I have redirected field day and Field Day to the specific section here. If anyone ever comes up with enough material for another article, please update those links. Thanks. Quill 21:34, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

to merge or not to merge

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was Do not merge

It has been suggested that "State fair" be merged into this article.

oppose merge. Unless it is clear that a livestock show comprises all the elements of an Ag show, such as an amusement park, sideshows, trade fair etc. The livestock show article suggests that a livestock show could be that large or could be a small exhibition of breeding stock. In that case, a short article on the specifics of a livestock show is appropriate as it is not covered here, and it really doesn't have to be. Quill 20:18, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

oppose merge. Ag show implies corn and vegetables. Livestock shows are strictly animals.

oppose merge. State Fairs are a combination of agricultural, other competitions, midway rides, concerts, and other things. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 05:45, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly oppose This is a terrible idea, and whoever suggested it hasn't discussed why. State fairs were first created in the 19th century, when the U.S. was still a predominantly agrarian society. As it became more industrial in the 20th century, the fairs adapted to this to the point where today, they are cultural events, including entertainment, auto racing, amusement, and more. This merge would be inappropriate. State fair may be a bit thin (little more than a list), but the remedy is developing it, not effectively burrying it somewhere else. Since the suggestion is so old, I will be bold, close this, and remove the tags. JustinTime55 (talk) 16:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Royal shows

I'm not sure what the point is of the distinction between the lists of "Royal" shows and "Other" shows in this article. If it's merely "shows with/without 'Royal'" in their title" then firstly that's a trivial distinction, apparent from the name itself, and secondly three of the shows in the "Royal" list (Great Yorkshire Show, Tendring Hundred Show and Cloone Agricultural Show) shouldn't be on that list as there's no "Royal" in the name. If there's some other attribute that makes a show "Royal" ("visited by royalty at some time?") then firstly the article should make this clear and secondly that should be sourced, for example this.

I propose merging these two lists and breaking out into a separate List of Agricultural Shows. Tonywalton ^Talk 09:29, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the merging of the show list and The Royal show list is well past due. As said above, the only distinction between the two lists is the addition of the appellation/honourific Royal. Van Dieman (talk) 06:04, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the term "Royal" is used too indicate that a show is sponsored or arranged by the Royal Agricultural Society, and not due to any specific royal connection.82.34.107.136 (talk) 20:37, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here again the word Royal is an honourific conferred by the Monarch. There is no substantive difference in form or function, other than in name, between an Agricultural Society and a Royal Agricultural Society. Van Dieman (talk) 06:04, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Agricultural show. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hpj.com/archives/2008/jun08/jun23/Yellow-floweringalfalfatopi.cfm?title=Yellow-flowering%20alfalfa%20topic%20of%20June%2026%20field%20day

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]