Talk:Al-Amir bi-Ahkam Allah

Al-Amir bi-Ahkam Allah has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 8, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Military / Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

Islam: Muslim history / Shi'a Islam Mid‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Muslim history task force.
	This article is supported by the Shi'a Islam task force.

Egypt Mid‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages: Crusades Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Crusades task force.

Military history: Biography / African / Middle East / Medieval / Early Muslim / Crusades

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	African military history task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
	Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600)
	Crusades task force

A fact from Al-Amir bi-Ahkam Allah appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 May 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that medieval Muslim historians blamed al-Amir bi-Ahkam Allah for the loss of much of Palestine to the crusaders but, in reality, he played no role in the Fatimid government during that period?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Al-Amir bi-Ahkam Allah.

Wikipedia

Arabic?

The transcription "Al-Amīr" does not seem to match Arabic الآمر ... AnonMoos (talk) 07:03, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed the transliteration according to the cited form الآمر.

-- 19:53, 12 November 2008 User:Emilyzilch

Coinage

Feel free to insert this coin into the article. PHG (talk) 20:16, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Al-Amir bi-Ahkam Allah/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Al Ameer son (talk · contribs) 04:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will begin review within the coming few days; made some minor copyedits, feel free to revert if unhelpful. Al Ameer (talk) 04:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments/SuggestionsReview

Reign in the infobox?
- Wow, how did I miss that? Added.
Consistency with capitalizations of Caliph and Imam ("the tenth Fatimid Caliph, and the 20th Imam of the Musta'li Isma'ili sect" and "ninth Fatimid imam-caliph, al-Musta'li")
- Fixed.
Do we know the names of his mother and his wife (the daughter of al-Afdal)
- Gibb gives the name (or rather title) Sitt al-Mulk for his mother, but I haven't been able to corroborate it. The title is otherwise treated as unique for Sitt al-Mulk, the daughter of al-Aziz. Al-Afdal's daughter is not named in my sources (would have to look into primary sources likely). Will add if I find anything.
"… the main preoccupation of the Fatimid state was the conflict" → "… the Fatimid state was preoccupied with the conflict"
- Rephrased.
Perhaps a little more context about the "territorial losses in the previous decade" and the Nizari schism. A footnote would also suffice.
- Done.
"coastal cities" → "Syrian (or Levantine) coastal cities"
- Done.
Add a map showing the Crusader states/Fatimid Egypt. Al Ameer (talk) 03:17, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Map added.

@Al Ameer son: I have addressed the points above. Anything else? Constantine ✍ 06:52, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is all. Thanks for another great article on one of the lesser known Fatimid caliphs. Al Ameer (talk) 15:57, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 00:36, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that medieval Muslim historians blamed al-Amir bi-Ahkam Allah for the loss of much of Palestine to the crusaders but, in reality, he played no role in the Fatimid government during that period? Source: Walker, Paul E. (2011). "al-Āmir bi-Aḥkām Allāh". In Fleet, Kate; Krämer, Gudrun; Matringe, Denis; Nawas, John; Stewart, Devin J. (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam, THREE. Brill Online. ISSN 1873-9830.
- ALT1: ... that the assassination of al-Amir bi-Ahkam Allah both undid his attempts to concentrate power in the caliph's hands and endangered the very survival of the Fatimid dynasty? Source: Brett, Michael (2017). The Fatimid Empire. The Edinburgh History of the Islamic Empires. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 978-0-7486-4076-8. Page 261
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Jabari Smith Jr.

Improved to Good Article status by Cplakidas (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 21:06, 14 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Al-Amir bi-Ahkam Allah; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General eligibility:
New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting:
Other problems:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

Article improved to GA status on the 8th, 6 days before the nomination, just under the wire but still soon enough. QPQ satisfied. Article is well written and well cited. Random spot checks doesn't find anything, same with Earwig. Passages are reliably cited, though it was not easy getting a hold of the sources. I made one minor modification to the first hook, please review when able. No other issues noted, passing both hooks. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 23:40, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Add back double links in infobox

Heyy, Neveselbert and Cplakidas: you (separately) removed links I'd put in "Cairo" and "Fatimid Caliphate" in the birth date field of the infobox.

I had seen them linked once within the infobox, but I chose to link them a second time at the place of birth as I figured (from my own behaviour) that birth- and death-date and place are spots where a lot of readers would glance first; Cairo being linked in the caption at the top would be completely lost, and perhaps readers wouldn't look at the caliph's title before his place of birth. What do you think, do you disagree with this rationale?

I only found out about MOS:GEOLINK while voraciously reading the manual of style for linking before posting this, but separate links to modern-day Cairo and the Fatimid Caliphate still make sense to me, as the Caliphate is a historical geographic place—and linking it here will provide important context about the historical state, at the expense of some link clarity, to readers who will glance at the infobox first. —I'llbeyourbeach (talk) 20:13, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@I'llbeyourbeach I don’t disagree with your quite sensible suggestion, the problem is though that in any upcoming review process (I am planning to get this up to FA standard fairly soon) they will be required to be removed again per MOS. Constantine ✍ 20:20, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The MOS isn't absolute is it? You can show them my (our? ^-^) rationale for making the exception. —I'llbeyourbeach (talk) 20:23, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've adjusted the link to Cairo in the caption to Islamic Cairo and restored the link in |birth_place=. I don't think a second link to Fatimid Caliphate would be necessarily helpful. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 07:22, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]