Talk:Atari, Inc. (1993–present)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Atari, Inc. (1993–present) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Atari, Inc." 1993–present – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1 |
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the GT Interactive Software page were merged into Atari, Inc. (1993–present) on 5 June 2016. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
4=Tene, David (December 7, 1998). "Lagardère intéressé par GT Interactive" (in French). Archived from the original on August 22, 2001. 5=Tene, David (July 9, 1999). "GT Interactive : une proie très convoitée" (in French). Archived from the original on February 13, 2002. 6=Mantaux, Steve (November 16, 1999). "Le français Infogrames rachète l'américain GT Interactive pour 135 millions de dollars" (in French). Archived from the original on December 21, 2001. |
Start with "The nth incarnation of Atari, Inc. [...]"
[edit]I liked the idea of mentioning it explicitly like that in the lead sentence, because both companies shared the exact same name and worked in the exact same business. Both leads only drop that there was a prior/later Atari, Inc. further on in the next paragraph, @IceWelder. There is the hatnote, but I figured more people read the lead sentence before the hatnote. —I'llbeyourbeach (talk) 20:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- The article title is already indicative of there being multiple topics of the exact same name, and the respective other entity should already be mentioned somewhere in the lead. An explicit "first/second incarnation" feels a bit superfluous, and nothing comparable is being done in other projects as far as I am aware. It should also be noted that "incarnation" is a bit misleading since the companies having nothing to do with each other than the current company's parent having purchased the former company's trademarks and some IPs. IceWelder [✉] 08:52, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia requested photographs
- C-Class company articles
- Mid-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class video game articles
- Mid-importance video game articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- C-Class New York City articles
- Mid-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles