Jump to content

Talk:Banyan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Banyan in Filipino myth

[edit]

I seem to recall there was a notation in "The Banyan in Religion and Myth" of the Banyan's role in Philippine myth. (It is locally known as the balite) I now cannot find that notation nor find its addition in the history section of this article. I'd like to find a citation so I can put it back. But may I know why it was removed in the first place? I wouldn't want to be wasting my time. Alternativity 13:04, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Ficus retusa

[edit]

I suggest adding the Ficus retusa to this page, since it has also been called a Banyan. However, I don't know too much about biology and so I want to let others decide what to do. Thank you for your help! --Ghormax 21:32, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Florida

[edit]

The section "List of Species" seems to contradict itself. It says: 'The first banyan tree in the U.S. was planted by Thomas Alva Edison in Fort Myers, Florida.' but then says: 'The Strangler Fig (Ficus citrifolia) is native to southern Florida' and 'The Florida Strangler Fig (Ficus aurea) is also native to southern Florida'

Merge suggestion

[edit]

There's a separate "strangler fig" article. The banyan page is more comprehensive of different subspecies in different parts of the world; it also has more detail, and a more professional/encyclopedic tone. I'm not sure if there's anything on the Strangler Fig page that isn't also on the Banyan page; maybe the Strangler Fig article just needs to be deleted...? --Vcrs 08:45, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Banyan tends to be the common name for this group of figs in south Asia/Austrailia, while strangler figs tends to be more common name for the Americas and Africa, if the strangler fig article was deleted, I recommend augmenting the name of the banyan article to include strangler fig in (). I have also noticed that Banyan is used to describe the trees out of the forest context (desert, deforested area etc...), as apposed to being in a standing rainforest, where strangler fig is often used. But my experience with these specific trees is limited, so someone else might have better information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.205.103.23 (talk • contribs) .

It appears that some species has been called The Strangler Fig, but Strangler fig is used as a generic name for figs with a particular growth history and form. It is a generic term while Banyan is a specific name for Ficus benghalensis. It however appears that some people have extended the usage of Banyan to other species. I would not merge them as one is about figs with a particular growth form and the other is about a particular species. Strangler figs species that I could find on the net include Ficus pertusa F. tuerckheimii Ficus watkinsiana Ficus aurea Ficus rubignosa ... [1] Not enough reason for a merge. Shyamal 09:41, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that all Banyans are strangler figs, but not all strangler figs are Banyans. Og course I'm on thin ice analysing two common names, but there are a number of Ficus which, while they strangle their hosts, do not send down aerial roots at a distance from their main "trunks" the way figs that we usually call "Banyan" do. Ficus costaricensis, which shares its Spanish common name "Higuerón" with Ficus citrifolia (and which, by the way, deserves mention in the page on Srangler Figs or even a page of its own, confines its aerial roots to "home base." (unsigned)

new proposal

[edit]
Actually it appears that they are synonyms. Examples:
  • "The name ‘Strangler Fig’ is usually applied to a group of species known under the common name of the ‘Banyan Tree’." ausemade.com.au
  • "Strangler figs are also known as banyan trees. " blueplanetbiomes.org
  • http://www.ias.ac.in notes, "The Banyan (Ficus benghalensis) and the Peepul (Ficus religiosa) trees associated with the Buddha come under a family of trees with murderous tendencies. ", but then uses "banyan" (lowercase) to refer to both.
It appears that Banyan (capitalized) is Ficus benghalensis, but banyan is the same as strangler fig. This is similar to Ficus citrifolia, the common name of which is Strangler Fig (capitalized). I'm going to ask for a merge here again (see my username for my bias) and ask for input from the Plants WikiProject. - BanyanTree 06:01, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Correcting myself: It appears that Ficus aurea is the Florida Strangler Fig, but that the common names of Ficus citrifolia are "Shortleaf Fig" and "Wild Banyantree". (itis.gov) I am still unsure why Strangler Fig is capitalized as a proper noun. - BanyanTree 06:27, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
After one positive response on the Plant WP talk page and no response here, I've gone ahead and merged. - BanyanTree 07:58, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Banyans (esp F. benghalensis) typically grows the prop roots downward from the branches hanging in the air. All the strangler figs that I am familiar with grow the roots along the surface (and never hanging freely) of the host tree. Both banyans and the vast variety of strangler figs have the common feature of starting off life as epiphytes, with the seed often dropped by frugivorous birds. Both terms (banyan and strangler fig) are common names (like Tea and Coffee) that cover a wide range of species, and there are probably no simple rules of association between them in terms of species. Shyamal 12:13, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can you pull up some references? The links above seem unequivocal in stating that they are identical. - BanyanTree 13:13, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This has some info in the ecology section. It will take a while to check the literature for me, but I think the botany folks on the commons (esp the very active German group) might be a better bet for good scholarly references. Shyamal 13:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Somebody with access may like to check out this. A key to the Moraceae PDF Refers to stranglers as a generic term[ http://www.pang-soong-lodge.com/trailguide/07_treespecies.htm generic strangler usage] etc. Shyamal 13:55, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plants at first epiphytic or epilithic, with long aerial roots which can form new trunks (“"banyan"”) or strangle host plant (“"strangler fig"”), usually without well-defined main trunk; figs often with inner and sometimes also outer layer of stone cells; leaf blade with wax gland abaxially at base of midvein or absent (spp. 1–23)

— Zhou Zhekun & Michael G. Gilbert, Flora of China 5: 21-73. 2003.
The quote above from the flora indicates quite clearly that both Banyan and strangler fig are very generic terms (they list in the key 123 species belonging to this group. The idea of the forms are also noted - those with aerial prop roots that can form new trunks as characteristic of banyans and those that form roots that strangle host plants as characteristic of strangler figs. Actually the idea that there is no the strangler fig should be emphasized although local usage may give specific meaning (just as people may talk about the pine). The banyan tree is however almost always at least in India - Ficus benghalensis. Shyamal 15:45, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I have to disagree with your last point. I chose my online name from hearing it in reference to Micronesia, and I didn't realize it was a term known outside of there until several people online asked if I was from Australia or Hawaii. I don't think I knew that it was used in south Asia until I found this article. Conversely, the University of Florida says that F. aurea is the Strangler Fig.
What do you suggest as a page title? It looks like I've being forced to google every single word in the article as Urostigma looks wrong as well. I'm not sure the difference you explain above merits two articles. - BanyanTree 18:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Taking another look, I'm still not entirely that we are talking about entirely different things. The third public link you provide states,

Ficus benjamina is what has been called a “strangling” tree. Birds eating figs of “stranglers” disperse seeds on the branches of canopy trees. These seeds germinate as epiphytes (growing on another plant) and grow adventitious (aerial) roots downwards which tend to clasp and eventually envelop the support (not host) tree.

Note the "aerial" and "tend". The first link, "Plants at first epiphytic or epilithic, with long aerial roots which can form new trunks (“banyan”) or strangle host plant (“strangler fig”), usually without well-defined main trunk" is most clear, while the second, "In the group known as strangler figs, a seed germinates in the leaf litter accumulated in another tree, usually in the axis between two branches. The fig sapling develops roots down the trunk of the host tree until reaching the ground." doesn't compare. I don't have access to JSTOR.

In comparison, see washington.edu,

Banyans usually do the opposite: they sprout from seeds that have been left by birds high in a tree, and grow down toward the ground. The seedling first anchors itself by sending roots into the little pocket of decaying leaves or moss where it has sprouted, then it wraps more and more roots around the tree that supports it, called the "host" tree. Soon the banyan's roots are spreading down the trunk, and finally they reach all the way to the ground.

Exactly the same definition you are giving strangler figs. In the photos here with captions such as "At the base, the banyan roots already circle over half of the palm's trunk and as they enter the ground they will be able to grow much more vigorously."

Gajumaru Tree

[edit]

Simply as a suggestion, I believe there should be a redirect to this page from the title gajumaru tree (as it is known in large areas of Japan and Northeast Asia). I would do it myself, but computers are my nemesis... sad... 207.219.69.216 (talk) 12:01, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Sean[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Banyan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. One okay, other three failed because link rot set in before their urls were archived. Worldbruce (talk) 04:25, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Banyan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:24, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Banyan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.networx.com/article/the-magic-of-banyan-trees. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Declangi (talk) 05:20, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fruit?

[edit]

Not being familiar with Banyan trees, when I hear that it is a type of fig, my first question is: Does it bear edible fruit?

I'm guessing that since there is no mention, it's at least not an important source of commercial fruit, but does anyone have a clear reference on the fruit or lack there of of the tree? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.202.33.17 (talk) 22:19, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Distribution?

[edit]

The article provides no information on this, which it needs to - and clearly. Tropical only? Subtropical? Hanoi Road (talk) 18:56, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's because the article covers a subgenus including a number of species, each with fairly broad distribution. Some of the individual species' distributions are mentioned in the Classification section. Collectively very widely distributed, tropical and subtropical. The individual species articles are the place for detailed distributions. Declangi (talk) 21:40, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Topic

[edit]

Not proper explanation. 103.189.221.139 (talk) 12:20, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Banyan&oldid=1258758166"