Talk:Betty Diamond
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
content moved from Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)
[edit]In the article Betty Diamond there is a list of publications. The first one looks questionable for several reasons. She isn't supposed to write her own article. Or if it's not that, no one's Wikipedia page is their own.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:59, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Looks like WP:RESUME to me. Would AfD solve this? — Timneu22 · talk 20:01, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- AfD would not, since she almost certainly passes a notability test. WP:RESUME does not, at a quick glance, provide deletion as a sanction. Meanwhile the addition of "my own webpage" to the list of key publications was added by a mischievous IP. --Tagishsimon (talk) 20:05, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, yeah, I didn't consider vandalism.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:15, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- There definitely appears to be some issues around Diamond, the Feinstein Institute, and various other entries in that garden. I'm not sure what the source is, but it appears to be a bit more directed than random vandalism. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:29, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- My main interest is that one of her co-authors may be notable enough for an article, so I put him/her on a disambiguation page. Then again, he/she may not.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:32, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- There definitely appears to be some issues around Diamond, the Feinstein Institute, and various other entries in that garden. I'm not sure what the source is, but it appears to be a bit more directed than random vandalism. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:29, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, yeah, I didn't consider vandalism.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:15, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- AfD would not, since she almost certainly passes a notability test. WP:RESUME does not, at a quick glance, provide deletion as a sanction. Meanwhile the addition of "my own webpage" to the list of key publications was added by a mischievous IP. --Tagishsimon (talk) 20:05, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Betty Diamond. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100615080354/http://www.iom.edu/Global/Directory/Detail.aspx?id=0020013827 to http://www.iom.edu/Global/Directory/Detail.aspx?id=0020013827
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110907013623/http://www.arthritis.org/howley-prize-recipients.php to http://www.arthritis.org/howley-prize-recipients.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930045258/http://www.lupus.org/webmodules/webarticlesnet/templates/new_empty.aspx?articleid=2090&zoneid=76 to http://www.lupus.org/webmodules/webarticlesnet/templates/new_empty.aspx?articleid=2090&zoneid=76
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
COI tag
[edit]I've added a conflict of interest tag to this article. This signifies to readers that the article has been extensively edited by someone with a conflict of interest, and is likely to have bias, in the form of missing negative content, overemphasis on "positives", non-neutral language (all of which are violations of the WP:NPOV content policy), and is likely to have unsourced or poorly sourced content, in violation of the WP:VERIFY content policy. It is likely that the content promotes the subject of the article, in violation of the WP:PROMO policy. Independent editors need to review the article and correct it, and then may remove the tag. If you do so, please leave a note here. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 03:43, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class women's health articles
- Low-importance women's health articles
- WikiProject Women's Health articles
- Start-Class medicine articles
- Low-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- Articles edited by connected contributors