Talk:British Vogue
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the British Vogue article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 28 May 2019
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) Iffy★Chat -- 09:16, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Vogue (British magazine) → British Vogue – It’s what they call themselves, after all. Except Vogue (also known as American Vogue for semantics), all Vogues have their country or region’s name in the title. Calling it Vogue (British magazine) isn’t accurate. It makes it seem like it’s an extension of the American version rather than its own independent magazine all of which are under Condé Nast. Trillfendi (talk) 18:54, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support. Consistent with articles about other country editions of Vogue and what they call themselves on social media. —Gazoth (talk) 05:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support I agree to what Gazoth has mentioned. Barca (talk) 07:34, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
1953 magazine
[edit]How can a get a copy of or find one from 1953 when my mother in-law was on front page 81.178.220.196 (talk) 09:59, 15 March 2024 (UTC)