Jump to content

Talk:Bulgaria and the euro

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contradiction

[edit]

Please discuss at Talk:Euro#Contradiction. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 00:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not yet designed?

[edit]

...and they will be introduced within 2 years! They should already be strucking them. Haven't we overlooked the designs, or are the designs yet to be published? Steinbach (fka Caesarion) 19:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, it won't be introduced within 2 years now, neither was it to be introduced in two years when you wrote your comment. For some reason, we are not part of ERMII where we need to stay for 2 years before we introduce the euro and I haven't heard any of our politicians to mention that we need to be formally part of this... Maybe they don't know? :D --TAfricanski (talk) 13:48, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at United Kingdom Euro Coins

[edit]

Hi, there's a discussion currently ongoing about the potential renaming or merge/redirecting of this and other articles at Talk:United Kingdom euro coins#Crystal Balls that you may want to look at. I suggest that further discussion remain there. Thanks. Pfainuk talk 12:27, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coin design

[edit]

How come that we ended up with a single coin design? I believe that the optimal number is 3 designs - one for the small cents, one for the big cents and one for the euros. Why did we need that voting if we could employ 8 different designs with different symbols?! --TAfricanski (talk) 13:48, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The image Image:BGN195583.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --12:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update

[edit]

An update of the introduction is necessary: Bulgaria can't enter the Eurozone by 2015 because it isn't part of the ERM II where a two-year-phase is needed. --Edroeh (talk) 15:15, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done TDL (talk) 16:46, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bulgaria and the euro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:42, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

new report

[edit]

Like newspapers say a new ECB report has been published. For them who no how to deal with the figures. --2A02:908:C38:6A60:40EC:FB48:1F14:8FA7 (talk) 11:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done TDL (talk) 04:00, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bulgaria and the euro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:31, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"God protect Bulgaria" source quality

[edit]

The page has been recently updated saying that the Euro banknotes for Bulgaria will include a "God protect Bulgaria" saying. It seems very unlikely that the ECB would approve this, given that it could be very controversial. Is the source of good quality? Is the decision already taken, and is it binding? 82.48.140.71 (talk) 11:00, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bulgarian National Bank has no say in the design of Euro banknotes. The inscription Боже пази България translated by you will be minted on the 2 euro coins as announced by the bank. I fail to see the slightest vestige of controversy in this given that the traditional religion of Bulgaria is the Eastern Orthodox Christianity according to Article 13 of the Bulgarian constitution, and that the religion of the main religious minority is also theistic. Au contraire, the glaring source of controversy in the design of the coins is the apparent disregard of the sanctitude of Saint Paisiy Hilendarski (canonised in 1962) on the 2 euro coin. His sanctitude has already been disregarded on the 2 leva banknote, on the 2 leva coin and on the 2 golden leva from 2022, so this will be the fourth offence, if not rectified betimes. Bogorm (talk) 12:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Updating the table

[edit]

Hey could someone update the tables based on the new ECB report cause I am a little to dumb to figure out how to work with them 😃.

Thanks in advance Homuraexee (talk) 18:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]