Talk:Cherohala Skyway/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about Cherohala Skyway. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Untitled

Will edit further. --Doctorcherokee 21:45, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Merge TN 165

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion to merge Tennessee State Route 165 with the Cherohala Skyway. The results and the long time lapse indicate no change. WashuOtaku (talk) 00:08, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Tennessee State Route 165 runs concurrently with the Tennessee side of the Skyway. The infobox would have to be moved to the article. Mapsax (talk) 15:00, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Disagree This would make more sense if the NC side was also completely concurrent. Since it isn't... Famartin (talk) 19:38, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Comment I think that there should be a Infobox of The two routes and some info about the the Skyway. ACase0000 (talk) 23:10, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Disagree This gives a complete explanation of the Cherohala Skyway, while SR-165 and NC 143 share it together. Combining this article with one state route would be a disservice to the other state route that have equal dibs on it. --WashuOtaku (talk) 00:35, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Disagree Same with Washuotaku this wouldn't make since because its not just TN-165 it is also partly NC 143 and I don't feel that it isn't necessary. The skyway is like the Greensboro Urban Loop and look there are other articles that are fully part of the loop like Interstate 840 and Interstate 785--Ncchild (talk) 00:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- I-840 should be merged into the Urban Loop... (like Interstate 215 (Nevada)) --NE2 16:50, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Weak oppose, since the portion of SR 165 right next to the Tellico River predates the skyway. Perhaps the skyway article can cover details on the 1977 construction, while SR 165 (and NC 143) covers the older roads in detail. --NE2 16:50, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Oppose - TN 165 and the byway should remain separate articles, since not all of the byway is TN 165. Scenic byway articles describe the road differently than the numbered route article would. Dough 48 72 01:39, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cherohala Skyway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070625135217/http://www.tailofthedragon.com:80/cherohala.html to http://www.tailofthedragon.com/cherohala.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 21 November 2016 (UTC)