Talk:Construction aggregate

Mining High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Would it hurt someone to put a definition in here? You have what the materials are, what they are used in, that is is needed in all modern construction, but not what an aggregate does. At least, it could be stated better.

The USGS has information and statistics on the specialty lightweight aggregates: clay, perlite, pumice, and vermiculite. Bmhtayl 00:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clinker

Is it the same as aggregate?--عبد المؤمن (talk) 22:37, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Construction aggregate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.grdp.org/enwiki/static/documents/EWC_31-03-09_CH.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070829062229/http://www.cement.org/ to http://cement.org/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.sme.net/service.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:43, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dolomite

Can someone add more information on dolomite usage? Thanks. DAVRONOVA.A. ✉ ⚑ 17:00, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By continous effort of Mr.Shiv Prakash and k.j.anand Bituminous Concrete

"By continous effort of Mr.Shiv Prakash and k.j.anand Bituminous Concrete" Something wrong here ... Also reads like an ad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.170.196.53 (talk) 15:45, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aggrigate

Assignent 217.33.20.146 (talk) 10:10, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

European sizing

Apparently someone stuffed a paragraph on European sizing in front of the para on ASTM. It was evasive to the point that I didn't even know it was European, and almost perversely non-parallel in structure. Completely rewritten. But do we need to know five different EN numbers at this point in the lead? Not my call, but someone else might have an opinion. — MaxEnt 16:47, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]