Talk:Croatia–Serbia relations

Consulate General of Serbia in Vukovar was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 23 November 2011 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Croatia–Serbia relations. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Croatia Mid‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Serbia Mid‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Fascist (insult)#Serbian|insulting Croatian officials]] The anchor (#Serbian) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Request for comments

There is a request for comments that is likely of interest to this article at Talk:Rajka_Baković#Request for comments. --- Otr500 (talk) 16:18, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Croatia–Serbia relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120504142243/http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/comexpert/ANX/IV.htm to http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/comexpert/anx/IV.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:53, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Croatia–Serbia relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090916030858/http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/article.php?lang=en&ModuleId=10005449 to http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/article.php?lang=en&ModuleId=10005449
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.mvpei.hr/CustomPages/enwiki/static/HRV/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:14, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Croatia–Serbia relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080708160217/http://www.konzulat-srbije-rijeka.hr/index.php?strana=naslovne to http://www.konzulat-srbije-rijeka.hr/index.php?strana=naslovne

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

why is Serbo-Croatian/std in the lede?

This can-of-worms [as far as nationalists on Wiki] has nothing to do with the relations between these two countries. It looks tossed-in ... ? 50.111.60.40 (talk) 08:21, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's interesting info that languages are mutually intelligible, though probably a bit of a flamebait. For example Denmark–Norway relations doesn't include such a thing, but Denmark–Sweden relations does. India–Pakistan relations mentions it later. Moving it out of the lead as it's non-summary info, and leaving in just a summary like in the DK-SE article, would probably be reasonable. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 10:55, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Background section POV issue

The background section looks like a series of talking points to compose a suspiciously negative narrative. It's quite suspect that the Croat-Serb Coalition, creation of Yugoslavia, or much of the history of SFR Yugoslavia is left out. It's so shoddy it doesn't even mention other somewhat negative stuff, like the Serb-Catholic movement in Dubrovnik, or Croatian Spring, probably other topics where there was notable interaction between the two countries. It needs a serious review. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recentism with section #Relations since 2010?

The first time I had edited this article, it lacked any events between 2005 and 2020. Events from 2014 and 2018 have been added since then, but that's it. The rest of the section covers the last 3 years and it's probably going to grow, given that the article is receiving much more attention now than it did before. What do we do? –Vipz (talk) 10:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Franjo Tahy: what do you think? –Vipz (talk) 06:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I already thought about this. I would set the main sections into centuries (20th and 21st) and their sub-sections into decades ('90s, '00s, '10s and '20s). We are currently writing new content under the sub-heading "Relations since 2010", while in reality we entered well into 2020's. Franjo Tahy (talk) 13:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vipz Franjo Tahy (talk) 13:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]