Talk:David Neal (British Army officer)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / British / European C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

DSN 276 (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection. (link to declaration)

Sacking

In an interview on the BBC "Today podcast" with Amal Rajan and Nick Robinson, David Neal said that he had evidence that the Home Secretary, James Cleverley, had wanted to reappoint him for a further 3 years but had been overruled by "Number10". Kahuzi (talk) 09:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is a primary source so if included would have to be along the lines of "he claimed that..." to make it clear that it was not an independent source. MarcGarver (talk) 11:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]