Talk:Defense Readiness Reporting System

Military history: Technology / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

The last sentence of this article is factually wrong. GSORTS C ratings do not equate to the ESORTS "Yes," "Qualified Yes," and "No" ratings. More research is needed to define what those Y, Q, and N ratings mean. ESORTS readiness assessments are totally different construct applied to performance (outputs), whereas GSORTS C ratings are resources (inputs).

I took the GSORTS to ESORTS correspondence from a document which seems to have vanished. Maybe it was taken down because it had errors. In any case, I removed the correspondence as you suggest. Please feel free to expand on the difference between ESORTS and GSORTS in the article, particularly if you can make reference to publicly available documents to do so. Thanks! -- Shunpiker 14:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

non WP:MOS

I really don't understand the changes Ledatic96 is making to the DRRS article. If nothing else, the new content does not conform to Wikipedia's style guidelines in terms of heading, font size, and writing style. It appears more of an advertisement now than an encyclopedia article. I'm reverting the changes and suggest that substantial changes made are discussed here. Wikipelli ^Talk 23:56, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]