Talk:Dioscorea polystachya
 | The contents of the Dioscorea polystachya page were merged into Chinese yam on February 01 2016 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
 | This is the talk page of a redirect that has been merged and now targets the page: • Chinese yam Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Chinese yam Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Merger proposal
[edit]The first sentence of the article Dioscorea opposita as well as its "taxonomy" paragraph could maybe be left on that page to clarify the terminology. But the rest of the article is really concerned with Dioscorea polystachya and should probably be copied over. --KaiKemmann (talk) 02:08, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Agree We do not have articles under scientific names that are no longer recognized or are incorrect. Peter coxhead (talk) 13:23, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Agree Use of Dioscorea opposita should be discouraged on this site. --MCEllis (talk) 23:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)