Talk:El Disco Duro

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Puerto Rico Low‑importance

	Puerto Rico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin music: Reggaeton Low‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Reggaeton task force.

Reverted an edit made as a troll

A vandalizing edit was made by user "Zach Here" which added a whole new song to the album that doesn't actually exist. The song was named Despacito 2.0, from what was once in my opinion a sort of funny meme. This edit has been reverted. Please take some time to review the history to see the exact proof of what im claiming. LS Vietruan (talk) 18:43, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

If DY’s new album is confirmed to be under a different name, what about this page? --V DE VICTINI (talk) 00:19, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. It could be kept, as there seem to be plenty of sources about it – just because it is unreleased and will probably never be released doesn't mean that it's not notable. But the article needs completely revising now to see what is still valid. Richard3120 (talk) 02:04, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]