Talk:Engro Corporation

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Engro Corporation redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Not NPOV

Well, things weren't very good here... I asked for some help at the Teahouse, did my best to remove the blatantly promotional words and clauses, and placed a shedload of tags on uncited/possible original research. ElectronicsForDogs (talk) 16:08, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your work on this article @ElectronicsForDogs. In compare to even many bigger companies (Vopak, FrieslandCampina, etc.) the newly provided citations to verify and proof information are a lot now. Do you think the issues are now finally solved? Crosji (talk) 04:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me :) ElectronicsForDogs (talk) 08:59, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]