Talk:Fantasy World Dizzy

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants)
Purple Francis (8 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (9 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Warwickshire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warwickshire, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Warwickshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.WarwickshireWikipedia:WikiProject WarwickshireTemplate:WikiProject WarwickshireWikiProject Warwickshire articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This comment has nothing to do with anything

"However, it is unclear whether or not this was intended in a sarcastic manner." is the second funniest line I've ever seen in a Wikipedia article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.74.213.62 (talk) 20:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What was the funniest? -- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 08:32, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Trail. "His assignments inevitably lead him to discover environmental misdeeds, most often solved with a crushing right cross" 64.74.213.62 (talk) 19:03, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now can we start an argument about whether the heavily-pixelised picture can be taken as proof that Yahtzee REALLY think's it's one of the best games ever, or even that the picture is of Fantasy World Dizzy? Optimus Sledge (talk) 22:46, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He states in a later video that the list wasn't intended to be taken seriously. 82.18.130.161 (talk) 23:54, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why is so much of this article devoted to the hypothetical opinions of a single reviewer? BlackTerror (talk) 17:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because other areas relevant to the article have not yet been added to the article. Wikipedia is a work in progress, no article is ever "finished". --Taelus (talk) 08:11, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the sentence to state it was sarcasm.