Talk:Fellow of the Royal Society

London High‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science High‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Royal Society High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Royal Society, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Royal Society on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Royal SocietyWikipedia:WikiProject Royal SocietyTemplate:WikiProject Royal SocietyRoyal Society articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Nationality criteria

Is "UK and Commonwealth" redundant? The UK is in the Commonwealth.A Geek Tragedy 20:48, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, UK is redundant - but including United Kingdon is clearer to non-Commonwealth readers - I think :) — Saltmarsh 08:15, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd agree; US readers may not be very clear about the Commonwealth.--Runcorn 12:30, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's also inaccurate -- though a well-sourced inaccuracy from a (since revised to no longer contain this statement) page on the RS website. But looking elsewhere, such as currently available booklets on the election process, and the society's statutes, the criteria seems to be the citizens and current three-year residents of the Commonwealth and Ireland. Witness the awards to people like Luke A. J. O'Neill, not as far as I know a Commonwealth citizen nor a resident when nominated (though he had been previous). 109.255.211.6 (talk) 08:58, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prime Ministers with FRS

Winston Churchill, Clement Attlee, Harold Wilson and Margaret Thatcher were all elected Fellows of the Royal Society (at least according to Wikipedia). The former had no scientific background at all. Does anybody know if prior to the (very recent) intoduction of a seperate postion of Honourary Fellow it was common pratice for non-scientists to be honoured in this way? A Geek Tragedy 22:30, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Benjamin Disraeli was a Fellow. --Runcorn 19:06, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign Members

There is a Wikipedia category for this, but no explanation about this real world category. Anyone have insight into this? I'm trying to figure out what to do with David Hilbert. (John User:Jwy talk) 15:17, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found the appropriate information in the Royal Society article. I support merging the articles. . . (John User:Jwy talk) 15:26, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds eminently sensible Jwy. Also support a merge. ::Supergolden:: 09:21, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

'New' FRS page with description of award

I have created a 'new' Fellow of the Royal Society article to describe the awards of FRS, HonFRS and ForMemRS (which are often used interchangeably) as they deserve their own article separate from the Royal Society article.

Lots of articles link to this see e.g. Special:WhatLinksHere/Fellow of the Royal Society, more than 5000 articles by my count. This is why the award deserves its own page rather than redirection to a section which doesn't seem very satisfactory IMHO. Redirects have been set up for the following (broadly synonymous) articles:

The redirects divert to the Fellow of the Royal Society article, for example:

#REDIRECT [[Fellow of the Royal Society]]

instead of what they did previously which was mostly:

#REDIRECT [[Royal Society#Fellows]] {{R to section}}

The accompanying wikidata item d:Q15631401 now finally has an english language wikipedia article associated with it, in addition to the six other languages.

Any comments or suggestions? @Johnbod: @Charles Matthews: let me know. Its is a WP:BOLD change! Duncan.Hull (talk) 21:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fellow of the Royal Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:37, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalisation

This article is inconsistent in terms of capitalising 'fellow.' While internally at the Royal Society we always use a capital 'F' the consensus at WP seems to be not to capitalise. So this article should probably be standardised to lower case 'f' within sentences. Point of Presence talk 13:11, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign members

I was reading Augustin-Louis Cauchy listed with post nominals as those of someone from the Commonwealth today. It got me curious. Has this practice changed? I couldn't find any real source outside of Wikipedia and I thought like this was the place to ask since from what I see and have read he was always French? 2A02:1406:B:3D6F:85D0:9D6A:76C9:D05B (talk) 19:13, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]