Talk:GMC Typhoon

merge?

HMMM.... SUV AND TRUCK TWO DIFFRENT NAMES.... RETARDS

No merging you fools!--Nytemunkey 04:21, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NO!!!, why change something that works! Bad BAD BAD

The typhoon is another car than the syclone pickup April, 25th 2007 (Norway)

YES MERGE!!! 72.80.39.254 19:58, 23 May 2007 (UTC) ZEE_RR 2007[reply]

It makes more sense not to merge these entries. The vehicles have significant differences even beyond one being an SUV, and the other being a pickup (e.g., an electronic self-leveling suspension in one, but not the other, not to mention a binary difference in towing ability, parts, several options, etc. I don't see much support for this merging proposal; can we lay it to rest? Thewumpus August 27, 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thewumpus (talk • contribs) 15:32, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

"Three trucks"?

It says in the article that "All three trucks were built for GMC by Production Automotive Services of Troy, Michigan." Which "three trucks" are we referring to here? There is the Syclone and the Typhoon. The only other truck mentioned in the article is the regular GMC Jimmy, which I image was produced by GM (also, I would assume that Production Automotive Services didn't PRODUCE the SyTy's, but rather MODIFIED factory chassis shipped to them by the factory). I would like a clarification of this "all three trucks", as it doesn't make much sense the way it's written...does it refer to a prototype as well? Wasn't there a prototype for both pickup and SUV versions? Wouldn't that make it FOUR trucks? In any case, the whole article seems a bit brief, somehow. There must be more info than this out there?.45Colt 16:46, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]