Talk:High potential

There is an upcoming major US network show called High Potential which may make the redirect inconvenient.

https://www.google.com/search?gs_ssp=eJzj4tVP1zc0LDMzLDKrMDYzYPTiy8hMz1AoyC9JzSvJTMwBAIz_Cb4&q=high+potential&oq=high+pot&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqDQgBEC4YgwEYsQMYgAQyEAgAEAAYgwEY4wIYsQMYgAQyDQgBEC4YgwEYsQMYgAQyCggCEAAYsQMYgAQyCggDEAAYsQMYgAQyDQgEEAAYgwEYsQMYgAQyBggFEEUYOTIGCAYQRRg8MgYIBxBFGDzSAQg0MTY3ajBqN6gCCLACAQ&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 2001:569:789C:5500:B432:9D1:A35B:3665 (talk) 04:37, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:High Potential (TV series) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 19:23, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 November 2024

It has been proposed in this section that High potential be renamed and moved to High potential (disambiguation).

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

High potential → High potential (disambiguation) – High potential should WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT at Intellectual giftedness due to page views [1], [2] [3] [4]. Theparties (talk) 21:57, 17 November 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Raladic (talk) 03:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If moved the title case version should continue to redirect to the DAB unless the TV series is moved due to the other RM. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - pageviews alone do not a primary topic/redirect make. estar8806 (talk) ★ 01:34, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The argument is not helped by "high potential" not being mentioned at Intellectual giftedness. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, now it is. But will cast my lot with the opposers, let the reader find the topic they prefer and maybe explore the other. Randy Kryn (talk) 01:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per nomination, estar8806, Shhhnotsoloud and Randy Kryn. No need for the parenthetical qualifier "(disambiguation)". Users researching Intellectual giftedness can access it directly, while those who may refer to it as "high potential" will see that alternative form at or near the top of the High potential dab page. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 20:06, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]