Talk:History of Freemasonry in France

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance

Freemasonry

This redirect is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry

◆ WikiProject Freemasonry's "Top of the Trestleboard":

Improve to Featured Article status
Add content to stubs…
Check recently changed articles for possible improvement, to remove vandalism, etc.
Requests
[Watch this list]
- Articles for all United Grand Lodge of England-recognized Grand Lodges (if notable)
Participate in articles listed for deletion
Need images
New Article to be created

Continental

I noticed there wasn't a link to this article built in, so I entered a link to it in the prelude Louisiana issue. The 1877 divide is already incorporated I see, having access to this other article gives additional information to readers about it. Tyciol (talk) 18:53, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of the split between GOdF and GLdF?

I don't find any mention of the schism between GOdF and GLdF in the 1880s... and come to think of it, I also don't see any mention of the decision to allow the admission of Atheists (starting in the 1870s) which led to the subsequent derecognition of GOdF by Anglo-American Freemasonry. Blueboar (talk) 19:20, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah... it was burried into discussion of the Scottish Rite... not quite accurate. I have amended things. Blueboar (talk) 19:45, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]