Talk:Human sexuality spectrum

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 January 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

Untitled

Commonly Labeled Sexualities Shouldn't gay and lesbian be sub labels of Homosexuality while pan be sub labels of bisexual and queer be both homo and bisexual? 74.104.150.176 (talk) 18:33, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2019 and 2 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): SkylarSmith. Peer reviewers: Spartandgc.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Making changes

I think this page could use changes on citations and the information under the Kinsey scale. I'm working on improving both of those.

--SkylarSmith (talk) 19:20, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Madeline[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose to merge Human sexuality spectrum into Heterosexual–homosexual continuum. The subjects of the two articles are, for all intents and purposes, identical, and there does not seem to be enough content in either one to warrant two separate articles. Human sexuality spectrum has several problems as an article, and Heterosexual–homosexual continuum seems to be a bit more thorough and is integrated into Categories of sexuality. 216.171.8.26 (talk) 08:27, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer discussion to the destination page's Talk section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.171.8.26 (talk) 08:43, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contentless merge to "Sexual orientation"

A total of 8 editors agree this page should be merged - me, the one directly above me, and the six on the AfD. That AfD was technically closed as keep but mainly because the nomination was for bad reasons, and the closer indicated that a separate merge proposal was likely to succeed. Examination of the discussion makes clear there is significant consensus that this article is redundant. Of the 8 in favor of merging, 5 agree on specifically merging to sexual orientation (me and 4 on the AfD).

Per WP:MERGETEXT, content should be copied over if any good content exists. There is none. Exactly everything covered here is already covered better over there (and in many other articles). Crossroads1 (talk) 18:48, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with the redirect. I don't see that anything needed merging. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:55, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]