Talk:Jim Chanos

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Other prediction

Apparently, he had also predicted the 2008 financial mess two years before it materialized in a meeting in Davos. This is according to Economist magazine of 21st January 2011

Wynn's Lawsuit

Steve Wynn filed a lawsuit against Chanos in a federal district court in California, alleging slander because Chanos supposedly said that Wynn had violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The judge dismissed this lawsuit, on the grounds that Chanos' actual statements were matters of opinion (and thus protected by law), not allegations of fact. the judge somewhat rebuked Wynn for misrepresenting those statements.

This should be in here, IMHO. --Christofurio (talk) 15:31, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Previous jobs

This should be in prose, it reads like a resume. And why would a Talk page be nominated for deletion? How will anyone be able to discuss the page?--LedgerTom (talk) 17:36, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on James Chanos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:01, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article title should be Jim Chanos?

Per WP:COMMONNAME I propose renaming the article title to Jim Chanos, as that is his most commonly used and recognizable first name. Any objections? Stonkaments (talk) 22:15, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Someone commented that the external links section was getting too long. Would it be better if the writings currently listed in the external links be made into a separate section instead?Stonkaments (talk) 05:13, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cryptocurrency section

James5Knight, this reversion of Nil Einne's edit did not have an edit summary to explain why you would reintroduce content that has already been contested by two different editors now. If you're wanting to re-introduce the content, you have the burden to improve it to an encyclopedic quality according to Wiki policies. Popoki35 (talk) 17:28, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]