Talk:Kid vs. Kat

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Canadian animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Its Made By 2 Films...

Freddy vs. Jason And Monsters vs. Aliens. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.71.11.125 (talk) 00:18, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? Darrenhusted (talk) 09:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

where it airs in norway

i know for a fact that it airs on tv2. it started airing there on monday the 21 of june. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.72.121 (talk) 09:50, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Country of Origin

Why is the series listed as a Canadian-American co-production? I thought Nickelodeon had nothing to do with the production and simply bought the rights to air the series. --A Laughton (talk) 18:47, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry not Nick but Disney. --70.30.0.28 (talk) 20:15, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kat to the Future Stolen Idea

When I went in the kid vs. kat wiki, I made a fanmade episode called "Kat to the Future, Part 1+2", And when the wiki is changed, and when the episode came out, I liked it, but I was upset that this idea was stolen. Please Help me! --Mario324 (talk) 16:50, 14 March 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.67.44.203 (talk) [reply]

File:Kid Vs Kat.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Kid Vs Kat.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 04:14, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kid vs. Kat, 2008.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Kid vs. Kat, 2008.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:14, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete the new updated file poster for Kid vs. Kat.

Please do not delete the new file poster for Kid vs. Kat. This is the actual official logo of the series. Please do not delete it. Google, asked me to put this on here, so Google gets all the credit, not me. Just, please leave this on here. It should not be deleted. Do not touch it, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.175.251.102 (talk) 03:30, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:KvKLogo.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:KvKLogo.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:KvKLogo.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 03:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is no Season 3.

There is no Season 3, and there are NO plans to renew the show at this time. Period. I asked the show's creator (an old friend) Rob Boutilier about that again this morning, in reference to this Wiki entry, and he replied: "Sigh... That's my online stalker spreading misinformation. There's no season 3 and there's no dvd... only itunes." The supposed source link for the Season 3 info leads only to a fan site, "Mr. Freak Wiki," which says that some fans have plans to make unauthorized Youtube videos of K vs K material. That's irrelevant, and in no way authorized (and they don't seem to exist yet, in any case). I am deleting any reference here to a third season. 69.165.162.236 (talk) 16:41, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Please accept my thanks. Sincerely, -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 05:39, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 December 2014

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Number 5 7 16:17, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kid vs. Kat → Kid vs Kat – As can be seen in the logo, "versus" is abbreviated as "vs" not "vs." there is no dot after the lowercase S. Relisted.Joeykai (talk) 17:10, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Ranze (talk) 00:44, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Seems like a good suggestion Oppose per Dicklyon. -CookieMonster755 (talk) 01:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)CookieMonster755[reply]

Oppose – logo is not mentioned in WP:TITLE as relevant to title styling. The period appears in reliable sources such as books. Dicklyon (talk) 05:53, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Dicklyon: I notice that the List of Latin abbreviations does not put a dot after "vs". Do we know which variant is more common in ordinary English? (I don't personally advocate following logo styling as guidance, which seems generally discouraged in Wikipedia guidelines.) —BarrelProof (talk) 17:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder where that came from. I'm not finding in guide books any suggestion to use vs without a period. Dicklyon (talk) 18:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Found the removal of period from the longstanding example: this recent uncommented diff; and I undid it. One can still wonder why not period in the table; I'll look some more; not much in talk. Dicklyon (talk) 18:28, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here it is: [1]. Looks like a simple accident. Shall we just fix it? Dicklyon (talk) 18:31, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I fixed it. Thanks for the alert. Dicklyon (talk) 18:34, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Dicklyon. -- Calidum 00:23, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nominator. JIP | Talk 20:34, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Dicklyon. Wikipedia MOS generally tries to follow ordinary English styling if found in reliable sources, rather than using logo-imitation styling. —BarrelProof (talk) 20:22, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@BarrelProof: There is a discussion about this right now at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Trademarks in two sections: Proposed change and Exclamations. Do we use ampersands and exclamations in article titles if that's what the show uses, (Aaahh!!! Real Monsters) And do we stylize slogans like I♥️NY. Tangential, but I thought I'd mention it. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:37, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Dicklyon and BarrelProof. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:19, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per other opposers. AnimatedZebra (talk) 02:05, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request For those who are responding "per" other users, can you please expand a little on your comments? As we all know, consensus isn't determined through voting. Danke, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:44, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

True but if someone else has basically stated everything that you were planning on saying it would be redundant to repeat the entire argument again.--64.229.165.152 (talk) 21:39, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't voting "per" means agree with the argument as stated. This RM has failed to gain support can someone please close it. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:21, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Comments

I think official sources should take priority over these unofficial books. Like in a basic search this comes up:

Kid vs Kat | Disney XD

disneyxd.disney.com/kid-vs-kat

Kid vs Kat. What do you do when there's a mutant alien pet bent on your destruction, but nobody believes you? You fight back! Coop has a pretty normal life until his ...

Clearly how DXD listed it when they had a page. 64.228.90.177 (talk) 17:22, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion has been closed. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kid vs. Kat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:51, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Links removed

@OriginalMousetrap101: (contributions) appears to be removing links to this article from articles where they may be relevant, e.g. Coop and 2011 in animation. WeyerStudentOfAgrippa (talk) 21:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The user now appears to be edit warring. It is still not clear why the links were removed. WeyerStudentOfAgrippa (talk) 23:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]