Talk:Lingo (VoIP Service operator)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Isn't the long blurb about Primus's troubles completely out of place here? I mean the paragraph beginning with "In 2007, Primus Telecom admitted paying..."

This type of tangential information is not pertinent to the topic of Lingo. I have *no problem* with the information residing in the entry for Primus, but it does not belong here.

Just thought I'd ask for relevance before doing anything.

Hi - thanks for discussing before changing. Of the five paragraphs in the Lingo article, the second and third are really about parent Primus Telecom and could be deleted together. I saw the second paragraph as apparently PR, so I added the third for balance. The troubles at Primus are somewhat relevant to Lingo, given the many Lingo customer reports of dishonesty (which almost always starts at the top) and the marketing of 1-year prepaid contracts for service that Primus might be unable to fulfill. Also, the second paragraph cites no sources, while the third paragraph cites four. So, looking at paragraphs 2&3 as Primus assets (unsourced) and liabilities (sourced), I think if paragraph 3 is deleted then paragraph 2 should go with it.TVC 15 04:24, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

E911

Why is this section here? This is an issue that plagues all VoIP providers, not just Lingo -- ErnestVoice ^{(User) (Talk)} 18:59, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable Sources

Many of the references in this article are public forms and should be deleted. -- ErnestVoice ^{(User) (Talk)} 13:28, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lingo (VoIP Service operator). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090829203045/http://www.dc.bbb.org:80/report.html?national=y&compid=15303 to http://www.dc.bbb.org/report.html?national=y&compid=15303

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:58, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]