Talk:List of software related to augmented reality

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Add to list?

Total Immersion and Google Glass development software?

can't believe you missed Total Immersion (http://www.t-immersion.com/) and Google Glass (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Glass) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.153.230.50 (talk) 15:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@94.153.230.50: At least google glass is not software. --Fixuture (talk) 21:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ARCore?

See: Overview. - K (talk) 06:20, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't separate the list by "open source" & "proprietary": instead create one list (or one per section) with a column for "Open source" (yes/no)

The list(s) should be converted into a table and "Open source" (yes/no) should be one of its columns. --Fixuture (talk) 21:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree! I'll add it to my to-do list. Crunchydillpickle (talk) 22:56, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of augmented reality software. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120729215747/http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/augmented_reality_becoming_more_like_the_readwrite_web.php to http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/augmented_reality_becoming_more_like_the_readwrite_web.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaning up promotional material + potentially improving the "category" column

Hi all, I've noticed that there have been a few single-use accounts adding entries of questionable notability to this list. I'd appreciate some help making sure the list complies with WP:N.In addition, I put a "category" column in the table when I transitioned the article from list to table. First of all, I hope the table looks okay. I'm pretty new here and I certainly don't trust myself to do these sorts of things without making a few mistakes, so I'd appreciate you looking it over. Second of all, I'm not sure how meaningful the "category" column is because I don't have much background knowledge of the topic. Let me know if you think that column should be altered or eliminated. Thanks! :) Crunchydillpickle (talk) 18:06, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]