Talk:List of supersonic aircraft

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

List format

I'd like to see the current sectioning based on nationality replaced by a sortable table with separate columns for nationality, year, role, etc. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 17:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Something like this:

Type	Country	Date	Status	Role	Description
Bell X-1	USA	1946	Prototype	Experimental	First supersonic aircraft. Rocket powered.
Dassault Mirage III	France	1956	Production	Fighter	Tailless delta wing. Made in large numbers with many sub-variants.

Any thoughts? — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 21:00, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Classes

The standard list format at WP:AVILIST now includes a Class column. The default classes given are not really appropriate and the guideline allows the classes for this list to be agreed here. Some possible classes could be:

Rocket (includes hybrid jet/rocket)
Straight wing
Swept wing
Delta wing
Hypersonic
Military
Civil
Air-launched
VTOL

But clearly, these are based on different ideas and several may apply to a given design, which would break the ability to sort the list on them. It would be OK to mix two criteria only as long as there are no such overlaps. What would be the best approach to classifying supersonic aircraft, to make best use of the Class column? Powerplant, performance, wing design, or something else? — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 11:23, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Although we only have one but civil/military appears to be a distinctive class. MilborneOne (talk) 12:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would that be any more informative than the standard set of classes? Also, it is pretty much taken care of by the Role column. I'm struggling to think of a useful extra criterion that a reader might want to sort the list on. At the moment there are a scatter of entries by method of propulsion and takeoff. Any more informative ideas? — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 14:44, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I now think that the powerplant system best classifies these designs. All V/STOL types to date have had additional lift engines, leading to the possibility of different engine types for vertical and horizontal flight. Simply classifying them all as V/STOL resolves that problem. Some types, such as the Lockheed Blackbird, had hybrid turbo/ramjet engines. That leaves my current thoughts at:

Rocket
Ramjet
Turbojet
Turbofan
V/STOL
Hybrid

— Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 13:33, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speed Column

I suggest adding a new column for the max speed of the aircraft, so it can be easily be seen and sorted by.

—Fhcgh (talk) 21:18, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]