Talk:London Drugs

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the London Drugs article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Canada: British Columbia Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Title

LD is a very good retailer that shows the fabric of Canadian society i have expanded on it somewhat, albeit little please continue 68.147.221.49 19:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)ShariqH[reply]

Added some stores from memory. Will attempt to add rest later

Pure advertising

Yes, I like London Drugs too but this page is pure company bumf; its relevance to "Canadian Culture" is risible.

207.81.127.107 18:29, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. -- Tawker 18:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eventually the sales pitch will have to go. It demeans the concept of an encyclopedia. The same content could be rewritten as the corporate mission statement or an explanation of their marketing approach. It just doesn't fly as factual information the way it now reads. Landroo 03:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jesses James

What is that about? Otherwise, it seems mostly like advertising (however I hope my edit help cut that down a bit)

This is a giant ad for London Drugs, and it's laughable that it remain up in this form.

Working On It

I'm in the process of cleaning this up and removing much of bias. Any suggestions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tannerwaldo (talk • contribs) 20:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some thoughts. The Customer Service section listing their refund policy is not appropriate, in my opinion. This article should be more of a corporate biography of when it was founded, what it sells and where it's located, and maybe it's profits. Every major store has a 30-day refund policy. If someone wants to know this info, they can go to the store's website. I don't like it.

Also, I'm not a fan of listing every store location in a giant list like that. The articles on Safeway, Shoppers Drug Mart and other stores don't do this. The number of locations by province is all that's needed. It just makes the article look like a long list and it's not really relevant info. --Mezaco (talk) 18:29, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

London Drugs is a private corporation, so it doesn't release any financial information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tannerwaldo (talk • contribs) 15:40, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

Can somebody add a better photo? The current photo of some videotapes on a shelf shows nothing of this company's image or look. It could be anywhere. Can someone maybe add an outdoor photo of the outside of a London Drugs store? That seems to be the most standard photo format for stores (that's what is found on the articles for Safeway, Shoppers Drug Mart, etc). --Mezaco (talk) 18:24, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think someone would have to go take a picture of the store and upload it. Here's an example http://www.clearliteglass.com/wp-content/uploads/clearliteglass/LondonDrugs-8thStreet2_gallery.jpg but I cannot find any images on the web where the owner gives permission for it to be reused. JameyBM (talk) 22:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removing photos/pictures from a page

How does one remove a photograph from a page, such as the one on London Drugs' page? RjCan (talk) 12:02, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wheres the Drugs?

They are called London Drugs, the "drugs" should be explained more. What % of the store is drugs etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.37.187 (talk) 04:35, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]