This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Swap the recorded and composed sentences for the correct order
I feel that the current order is more appropriate, because typically a song is composed before it is recorded; it also matches the order in which the topics are discussed in the body of the article. It first gives context as to why Menzel didn't sing in the first film and Disney's plans to have her sing in Disenchanted, then Menken's writing of "Love Power", finally followed by the circumstances under which Menzel recorded it.--Changedforbetter (talk) 02:25, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Menken composed "Love Power" with" → "Menken composed the song with"
Because of the previous comment, I've left "Love Power" as-is here, and instead changed "the singer recorded "Love Power" in her home" to "the singer recorded it in her home".--Changedforbetter (talk) 02:25, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The third paragraph is too short; add the last two sentences of the second para to it to fix this
Where is the repetitive part sourced for Mashable?
The writer of the article complains that "the song they've given her here is underwhelming and forces her to belt the phrase 'love power' over and over, which makes less sense the more you hear it."--Changedforbetter (talk) 20:27, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I am aware, Heavy.com (reference 45) is to be used with discretion. According to the database, "Heavy.com should not be relied upon for any serious or contentious statements, including dates of birth." I do not feel that Menzel describing the musical mood of the song is a contentious statement. This is also the only instance in which this source is cited.--Changedforbetter (talk) 05:19, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
K. Peake Now that I have completed this section, I am hoping you could perhaps share some insight as to when it became mandatory (if it is, in fact, mandatory at all) for the names of certain publications to be cited as "Publisher" instead of a "Work", particularly websites, since these sources clearly already have a "Name of website" field in the reference template; or is this simply a matter of preference depending on the reviewer?--Changedforbetter (talk) 05:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your quick and detailed review. I begin addressing and responding to all points as soon as possible; please note that I may require a little longer than the typical 7 days to complete the responses (approximately three weeks at most).
Hello, the only thing left to do is compile a list of refs for the stronger inclusion part, maybe with The Rice Thresher separate though. K. Peake20:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
are unassessed)
On hold until all of the issues are fixed; took two days for this one! --K. Peake 16:58, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
