Talk:Lympstone Commando railway station

A fact from Lympstone Commando railway station appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 October 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that passengers for Lympstone Commando railway station have to pass an armed guard as the only access is through the adjacent Royal Marine Commando Training Centre?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/October.

Wikipedia

Trains: Stations / in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Access

Only people with business at the base may use the station... does this imply that the guard will require identification before stopping the train? Is the guard the first line of defence of the base... 82.10.108.49 (talk) 23:34, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The station is owned by Network Rail and the Ministry of Defence cannot prevent passengers from alighting there. The Ministry of Defence have accepted this through this FOI request but the only access to the station is from the camp via a guarded entrance. Rail enthusiasts could theoretically stand on the platform without any retribution from the Ministry of Defence. Martin H. Heron (talk) 21:48, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You can access the station from the Exe Trail. I have done so.Railwayfan2005 (talk) 22:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A video by Geoff Marshall on YouTube shows that you can now get off of trains and onto the Exe Trail without MoD permission (YouTube Link). Bthrussell (talk) 16:26, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Geoff Marshall video showing that the section regarding access may be incorrect: (YouTube Link). R4000 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.9.66.153 (talk) 17:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Exe Estuary Trail

Recent edits imply that the station has, or soon will have, public access from the Exe Estuary Trail; but AFAIK, Network Rail still state "The station only provides access to the adjacent military base".

A ref has been provided, however that ref is the front page of a website which does not of itself support either "The opening of the Exe Estuary Trail has lead to public access being made available" or "The Exe Trail now runs between the platform and the boundary of the base providing an means of public access". If this info is on a sub-page within that website, that subpage is the one which should be linked, not the front page. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:17, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lympstone Commando 142001 142063.jpg was taken from the Exe Valley Trail - it was open from Exmouth to Exton at the time. Although the station is on one side of the trail and the camp on the other, there was still no public access; the gate was unlocked by the camp guard when the train a approached. Geof Sheppard (talk) 15:54, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is this original research by yourself? Railwayfan2005 (talk) 21:44, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's not my photograph; I extracted it from the article but the description here reflects what I have observed. If you can find a good source for the article (either to prove that it is now open for general use, or not), then it would be most appreciated. Geof Sheppard (talk) 13:59, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have used the station to access the Trail, and walked up to Exton to catch the train back to Exeter. However citing this would constitute original research. It's reasonably clear from MAGIC that the cycle path runs between the railway line and the base.Railwayfan2005 (talk) 21:36, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lympstone Commando railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120803180356/http://www.exe-estuary.org/index/exe-news/latest_news_from_the_estuary.htm to http://www.exe-estuary.org/index/exe-news/latest_news_from_the_estuary.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:36, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]