Jump to content

Talk:MDNA (album)/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer:  (talk · contribs) 12:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will be reviewing this article within a week's time. — (talk) 12:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Overall: The article is in pretty good shape and ready for GA. Some points need to be addressed nonetheless:

Lead
  • "MDNA consisted of both introspective as well as upbeat songs" → unclear contrast. Upbeat songs can be introspective sometimes
  • "Lyrically the record explored themes such as partying, love for music, infatuation, as well as heartbreak, revenge and separation" → comma + any other way to shorten this?
  • "The media noted that no further promotion was done for the record." → unnecessary
  • downtempo is a specific genre. I assume you want to refer to balladic songs here?
Background
Recording
  • Wikilink to "recording" is unnecessary
  • "outside always" → "always outside" sounds better imo
  • "European sensibilities" → you mean common interests in food and films? This part sounds a bit off
Music
  • " the work with Solveig" → I'd prefer "the songs/tracks". "The work" sounds off to me
  • "It featured cheer-leading chants between the verses" → present tense
  • "Madonna daily life" → possessive pronoun
  • I notice a lot of past tense sentences here (Madonna sang, featured...). I recommend changing them all to present tenses
Critical reception
  • I'd recommend trimming the first paragraph, which strikes as a quote farm
  • "Orbit's production received positive feedback from critics." → You can cut this and directly say "Orbit's production received positive feedback from ABC..."; "critics" is overtly used

(talk) 09:04, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing HD. Will start by today :) —IB [ Poke ] 10:33, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hey @: all addressed. Please go ahead with her assessment. —IB [ Poke ] 20:50, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see no further issues. Passing this for GA status. Well done, especially since you have waited so long for this to be reviewed :) — (talk) 02:18, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.