Talk:Meghan McCain

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Meghan McCain article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 3 months

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Blogging (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fame And Opportunity Through Her Father

It should be made clearer through the wording in the page that she came to opportunity through her father's fame. Yes, she wrote a blog that people found interesting but that would not exist or get attention without her father being such a famous powerful person. Like so many other children of celebrities, her fame came directly as a result of her father's fame. 1.10.158.64 (talk) 09:36, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of children of famous people turn out losers even criminals. Graduates of Harvard and Yale do nothing with their lives. Every person is their own agent who use opportunities they are given, or not. Every successful person has others to thank along the way. -- GreenC 04:57, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed photo

Hey guys, User talk:KyleJoan wanted me to propose using this photo, File:Meghan McCain 2018.jpg, as the new infobox photo, it's a better profile, no mic, no awkward glance sideways. Thoughts? User:The One I Left^Discussion 04:01, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Current image
Proposed image

The current and proposed images are above. I personally believe the proposed image is oddly lit in part due to the woman on McCain's right obstructing the light from hitting her in the uncropped image. The mic in the current image does not obscure her face in any capacity, and I don't think the angle creates any awkwardness about it. KyleJoan^talk 08:23, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I'm gonna have to disagree, the second photo shows no signs of light being obscured, while the first does have a lubberly mic being in frame and the photo angle looks awkward to me. I feel like there's no question that the second photo shows a better perspective of her face. User:The One I Left^Discussion 04:29, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, but you need a consensus to change the infobox image, so how would you suggest we proceed? KyleJoan^talk 08:33, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I guess we have to wait for responses lol What do you suggest? User:The One I Left^Discussion 04:44, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oh I concur. Cheers! KyleJoan^talk 09:00, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

John McCain's death

Should the lede include John McCain's birth and death years [i.e., John McCain (1936–2018)]? KyleJoan^talk 04:37, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

diff. Seems relevant to indicated a famous parent is recently deceased to better place context. Also, calling him a "politician" doesn't help much in placing who he is, it would be better to say US Senator and Vietnam war hero. -- GreenC 04:48, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But what does her father's death have to do with her and her notability? And is the death only relevant because he is "recently deceased"? How much time needs to pass before it becomes irrelevant? "US Senator" is too Americentric, and "Vietnam war hero" fails WP:NPOV. Let's not open the door for others to be able to insert "Trump critic". KyleJoan^talk 04:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Add: If you believe "Vietnam war hero" is an appropriate description, why don't you include it in the lede of John McCain (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)? I'm actually curious what the users who watch that page would say about it. KyleJoan^talk 05:05, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agrees with her father on issues

the link goes to a blog, which basically says just that. doesnt say anything. just the agree on this issues. on stem cells and global warming. does she like the use of stem cells or dislike? does she believe in global warming or not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:5C8:C280:2D20:4DD4:DFD5:7CBB:2558 (talk) 23:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]