Talk:Mystique Summers Madison/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Another Believer (talk · contribs) 16:07, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Matthew Yeager (talk · contribs) 19:34, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Congratulations, and I'm looking forward to more nominations from you!

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Article reads very well to establish their notability, evolution of their career, and overall involvement in the space.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Excellent variety in popular TV info, relevant community publications, and classic media (books).

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Expanded to general works and activities while staying focused on primary notability.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Great captions which not only provide color, but are fully referenced within the article.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.