Talk:New Hampshire Supreme Court

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: New Hampshire Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Top-importance).

Law High‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Hampshire Supreme Court was a good article, but it was removed from the list as it no longer met the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.
Review: December 8, 2006.

GA on hold

Please attend to these concerns in order to get through GA process:

Both images don't give their fair use rationales.
The Lead section doesn't represent the breadth of the article.

All the other criteria are met. Lincher 02:51, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The lead has been expanded to better cover the entire article. The old publicity photo was removed, and the seal used at the top-right of the article contains a fair use notice for being an official seal. I believe the editing addresses your concerns. --Assawyer 01:25, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's been more than 7 days, and I see no reason to disagree with Lincher's original assessment, the concerns seem to be alleviated, so im promoting this. My main advice would be to, if at all possible, expand the references, and try looking at other state Supreme court articles for inspiration. If one of them is an FA, think about conforming this article's style with that one if possible, should give it more chance of making FA status. Homestarmy 21:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Education funding

Someone should update the history of the education cases to reflect the new decision handed down on September 8, 2006 rendering the latest education funding plan of the State Legislature unconstitutional. I don't know enough to write the update myself, unfortunately. TheDean 14:46, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reasons for GA Delisting

This article's GA status has been revoked because it fails criterion 2. b. of 'What is a Good Article?', which states;

(b) the citation of its sources using inline citations is required (this criterion is disputed by editors on Physics and Mathematics pages who have proposed a subject-specific guideline on citation, as well as some other editors — see talk page).

LuciferMorgan 14:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts for missing New Hampshire Supreme Court Justices

Drafts for missing New Hampshire Supreme Court Justices have been created at Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/United States judges and justices#New Hampshire.

Any help getting these articles finished and moved to mainspace would be appreciated. Cheers! BD2412 T 18:22, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]