Talk:Onondaga Park

This article was nominated for deletion on March 21, 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state): Syracuse

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syracuse, New York, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal

I'd like to merge the contents of Hiawatha Lake into this article. Having done what I can to expand both articles, I see no reason why a small man-made lake that is completely contained within this park needs a stand-alone article. About the only thing unique to that article is a couple of lines in need of citations, and a brief infobox; the very short article had changed very little in the ten years before I started tinkering yesterday. This seems uncontroversial, so unless there are any objections I will complete the merger in about two weeks. Antepenultimate (talk) 20:41, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Makes sense. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 17:38, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support; I've completed the merger. Antepenultimate (talk) 03:59, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]