Jump to content

Talk:Pietro Badoer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by CSJJ104 (talk21:45, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that Pietro Badoer was banished, poisoned his wife, was banished again, married again, and in his will left thousands of ducats to his legitimate children, an illegitimate son and a third wife? Source: several, in the article
    • ALT1: ... that Pietro Badoer was banished twice, poisoned one of his three wives, but declined an offer for a coup to make him doge? Source: several, in the article
    • ALT2: ... that Pietro Badoer managed to poison his first wife only in the fourth attempt, a crime which saw him banished for the second time, and in his will two more wives appear? Source: several, in the article
    • ALT3: ... that although Pietro Badoer's first wife got his sentence reduced, he attempted four times to poison her, and after finally succeeding got the same sentence again? Source: several, in the article
    • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Art collection in ancient Rome
    • Comment: There are porbably more possible hook variations, this man had a wild life... Thanks for the article @Srnec :)

Created by Srnec (talk). Nominated by LordPeterII (talk) at 18:15, 8 September 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • A wonderful article which gives a fascinating insight into some of the intrigues of medieval Europe. No copyright problems. Referencing is good. Article is long enough and new enough. Any of the suggested hooks would be OK, but the first one (ALT0) stands out as the best in my mind. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:33, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

C rating

[edit]

Rather than removing the "C" rating, why not accept it and continue improving the article? Three separate editors have given this rating using the Rater tool. Raters are under no obligation to provide specifics. For help, one might review Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment. —ADavidB 08:40, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]