Talk:Proper name mark

Unicode characters for these two marks

Evidently U+0332 COMBINING LOW LINE and U+1ADF COMBINING WIGGLY LINE BELOW (under ballot as of this date) should represent these. -- Evertype·✆ 11:24, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Using U+0332 would give 屈̲原̲放逐。Also even it works, it can't distinguish different words in the same sentence like 中國北京。--水水 (talk) 06:45, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't 司馬遷 be underlined as well? And maybe even 任安?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.174.92.126 (talk) 11:41, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 5 December 2024

It has been proposed in this section that Proper name mark be renamed and moved to Chinese punctuation for proper nouns.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Proper name mark → Chinese punctuation for proper nouns – Currently, this article's title obviously doesn't match its content. In fact, it started to describe the book title marks (in addition to the proper name mark) since the version "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Proper_name_mark&oldid=438848581" from thirteen years ago. The reason for the "move" is straightforward. 微甜微酸微苦＿＿微鹹 (talk) 09:15, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Remsense: What do you think now? 微甜微酸微苦＿＿微鹹 (talk) 09:44, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would be fine with the move, now that you've explained it. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 23:30, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]