Talk:Racine (band)
"...This article on a band or other musical ensemble is a stub. You can help by expanding it..."
Good luck waiting for that..
Sadly people seem extremely unwillingly to "help" expanding anything to do with Wendy James or her current career.
Why?
Apart from the fact that previous attempts at "expanding" the entry have been immediately seized upon by sycophantic EDITORS and heavily edited to suit their agendas as soon as they appeared...?
Apart from those same agendas having been exposed as nothing more than FAN WISHFUL THINKING instead of detatched editorial behaviour...?
Apart from the fact that contributing ANYTHING to this entry is often a sheer waste of time as the ARTIST deliberately tries to steer interested people or the media away from Wikipedia...?
Apart from the fact that WENDY JAMES herself and her (now ex) band members contributed absolutely NOTHING to their own wikipedia entries since they were first created...?
Apart from the fact the wikipedia entry has been EFFECTIVELY ABANDONED now that it didn't serve as "good public relations" for the artist as it was originally cynically concieived..?
Apart from the fact that even the OFFICIAL BAND SITE link had to be forcibly removed when it was found to be (unannounced publically as) long dead and abandoned.
Apart from the fact that WENDY JAMES has spat poison at people who have even dared to "mention" her wikipedia entry in rare interviews with her.
Apart from the fact that she did not link to it from the first day it existed to the recent break up of her band and since..
Because of the very fact it could be edited and contributed to by members of the public BEYOND Wendy's controlling "official" storyline..?
So again it is to be wondered WHY no rush of contributors to help "expand" this DYING stub..?
Do people not take time from their busy lives to UNSELFISHLY help WENDY JAMES to get some unpaid good p.r. and untrue hype for her (and only her) own commercial benefit alone.
Which she will not later thank them for or acknowledge even the rare "kind and positive" contributors..?
Such a mystery isn't it..?
As much as WHY THIS WHOLE DIS-CREDITED ENTRY STILL EVEN EXISTS ON WIKIPEDIA...?