Talk:Regency romance
 | A fact from Regency romance appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 September 2004. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Other Authors
[edit]I don't think that Barbara Cartland's books really count as Regency romances - my belief is that while she wrote very many romances, they are mostly set in the 20th century... but I could be wrong so I haven't changed the page.
I think, but am not sure, that another author who does do regency romances would be Jane Aitken Hodge - who also wrote the biography of G. Heyer. "The Private World of Goergette Heyer".
- I would agree about Barbara Cartland since her novels are all over the timespan. She was however widely read in her day. Jane Aiken Hodge wrote The Private World of Georgette Heyer (1984, out of print).
- Some Regency authors today refer to Jane Austen or Georgette Heyer as their inspiration; however, not all mention either! Among the best-known living Regency authors still writing about the Regency period today (some who have moved on to other genres are omitted) are
- Mary Balogh who now writes Regency historicals
- Eloisa James who writes Regency historicals
- Stephanie James who now writes Regency historicals
- Julia Quinn who writes Regency historicals
- The difference between Regency romances and Regency historicals is best explained by sites such as Good Ton: A resource for readers of Regencies and All About Romance: A Reader on Regencies by Karen Wheless
WorldCat Genres
[edit]Hello, I'm working with OCLC, and we are algorithmically generating data about different Genres, like notable Authors, Book, Movies, Subjects, Characters and Places. We have determined that this Wikipedia page has a close affintity to our detected Genere of love-stories. It might be useful to look at [1] for more information. Thanks. Maximilianklein (talk) 23:40, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Regency romance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071007135550/http://www.likesbooks.com/205.html to http://www.likesbooks.com/205.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012222224/http://www.likesbooks.com//karen.html to http://www.likesbooks.com/karen.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060717053727/http://www.likesbooks.com/regent.html to http://www.likesbooks.com/regent.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:32, 20 December 2017 (UTC)