Talk:Robot control

Robotics High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 January 2020 and 22 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Maro is god.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Control Theory Page?

I'm not much of a wikipedia editor, but this article seems to deal mostly with providing historical context for the much more thorough documentation on the Control Theory page. Either that or add more technical depth to this article, but I think that Control Theory probably covers it. 38.42.98.45 (talk) 02:07, 23 July 2024 (UTC)RobotNerd277 (not logged in)[reply]

Robot

Robot control means not only robotic arm control,there are a whole lot of things like mobile robot control,dynamic legged systems etc.The name of the present article should be changed from "Robot Control" to "Robotic Arm Control" or "Manipulator Control".But then we'll have to include a lot of addictional things about control...DH parameter is about joint-link control only,we have to care about actuator-joint mechanics too.Also,control is not only about mechanics!And,Robot kinematics,Arm solution,Inverse kinematics seems to be redundant topics. Also,D-H parametric notation is a very important and popular way of doing manipulator mechanics.Why not start a seperate article for it?--Sahodaran 11:40, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it is an option to keep the article for robot control, but update it thorougly. There is a need for a decent structuring of robotics articles. Since kinematics and dynamics are used in robot control it can be sufficient to link to robot kinematics and to robot dynamics. In these articles we can go deeper to the details because when you're only interested in the control of a robot, the exact details of the kinematics are not all important. For the current state of the article I propose to merge the DH convention in a seperate article Robotics conventions where one of the sections can be Link Frame conventions.--RobotNick 15:50, 13 April 2007

Attention needed

Everything, expand, links, everything

Chaosdruid (talk) 05:57, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]