Talk:Rossby wave

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

Weather: General Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the General meteorology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question: the difference between Biblio and Refs? Sorry about the wrong placing, if this is so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.135.100.127 (talk) 01:09, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correct expression for the Rossby parameter

Hi, as defined in a number of textbooks including Kundu and Cohen's Fluid Mechanics (3E, pp.588, 2004), the Coriolis parameter should have the radius of Earth "a" in the denominator. See here:

http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?id=rossby-parameter1

Another reference is Ch.7 of the notes from an MIT class in GFD:

http://www.whoi.edu/sbl/liteSite.do?litesiteid=8155&articleId=12248

Moreover, the definition of beta is beta = df/dy, so if we have the radius in the numerator the expression is dimensionally inconsistent.

What is an oceanic Rossby wave?

The article begins by explaining atmospheric Rossby waves, namely in terms of the jet stream and Coriolis forces, and emphasizes that "they are not to be confused with oceanic Rossby waves." The section at the end on oceanic Rossby waves begins with "Oceanic Rossby waves are thought to communicate climatic changes due to variability in forcing, due to both the wind and buoyancy." How is this supposed to help someone wanting to know what an oceanic Rossby wave is? Nowhere in this section is the concept even defined, let alone explained. --Vaughan Pratt (talk) 05:54, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This was exactly my thought and I was in fact going to make a comment till I saw this one. Hope someone competent can see to this concern.^^^^ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.35.109 (talk) 10:26, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a better explanation http://www.csa.com/discoveryguides/prednino/gloss_f.php Improved the part mentioned above. Prokaryotes (talk) 11:16, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot begin to understand this topic but here is an article that mentions oceanic Rossby waves https://quizzclub.com/stories/geography/unbelievable-the-mysterious-noise-from-the-caribbean-sea-may-be-heard-from-space/#.Wo9uuafxQEY.facebook --Brenont (talk) 04:54, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2teknikl

(81.11.207.128 (talk) 14:35, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rossby wave. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151201005036/http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/JRD/SAT/Rossby/Rossbyintro.html to http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/JRD/SAT/Rossby/Rossbyintro.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:09, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possible error

In the third sentence of the Atmospheric Waves section, the contrasting example states that a fluid moving towards the equator from the north will turn to the west. You've just said it turns to the east, though. I presume the phrase should read "from the south", accounting for the contrary spins of high and low pressure weather in each hemisphere.