Talk:San Gabriel Valley Council

Scouting Low‑importance

	Scouting portal San Gabriel Valley Council is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Merge

merge as per Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scouting/RulesStandards. Our intent is not to delete anyone's work or to minimize the importance of any article that already exists on the Wikipedia. Instead our goal is to tighten the information, to make it more relevant and useful for the general Wikipedian. This article will be absorbed in its entirety to the larger state Scouting article. The newer article will encompass OA lodges, Councils, early nonBSA Scouting organizations like Campfire or Woodcraft, Girl Scouting where applicable, and other ideas as they come up.Chris 06:38, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reinstate

I found new information and am reinstating the article. --evrik ^(talk) 17:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Once agin, User:Kintetsubuffalo acts, and quotes some sort of false policy. This article deserves to exist. --evrik ^(talk) 19:14, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Camp Cherry Valley merge

Council camps exist to serve the council; Camp Cherry Valley does not establish notability outside of the council. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk - 20:09, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Please show me the BSA policy, and the wikipedia policy that says, "Council camps exist to serve the council." Failing that, the article on the camp is longer than the one about the council. The camp gets 277,000 google hits [1]. That alone is good enough for notability. The cove and the camp get USGS mention. How many more reasons are needed? Ascoutnotapussy (talk) 00:08, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I extrapolate this from the same reasoning the BSA gives for OA lodges: "The lodge is not a separate entity unto itself. It is an integral part of the council operation and exists only because the council exists." [2] (Reply not anticipated from this user, as the account has been blocked for violation of user name policies.) --—— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk - 01:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BTW: Refining the search to "Camp Cherry Valley" scouts gets a lot fewer hits; all of the top hits are from unit and council sites. The camp is notable enough to be included in the council article, but there is nothing in the current article that differentiates it from any other Scout camp. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk - 14:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image

This image should be added into the article

File:Tribe of Torgau.png

65.196.107.250 (talk) 17:30, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on San Gabriel Valley Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Replaced archive link http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Ui5327WvrhEJ:legacy.billyholcomb.com/holcomb_valley_gold_discovery.htm+http://www.billyholcomb.com/holcomb_valley_gold_discovery.htm&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a&source=www.google.com with https://web.archive.org/web/20160404014200/http://legacy.billyholcomb.com/holcomb_valley_gold_discovery.htm on http://legacy.billyholcomb.com/holcomb_valley_gold_discovery.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:23, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Greater Los Angeles Area Council?

Given that GLAAC has long since subsumed LAAC and SGVC, it seems appropriate to merge them. Jordan Brown (talk) 21:46, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]