Talk:Saxophone sonata (Creston)

Saxophone sonata (Creston) is currently a Music good article nominee. Nominated by UpTheOctave! • 8^va? at 20:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)

Short description: Saxophone sonata by Paul Creston

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music

Did you know nomination

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the publishing of Paul Creston's saxophone sonata was delayed by a "rat with a toothbrush mustache"? Source: Morris, Willie (1996). The Development of the Saxophone Compositions of Paul Creston (DMA thesis). University of Missouri–Kansas City. OCLC 35239809. p 118. As quoted in article.
- Reviewed:
- Comment: Can supply other hooks if need be :)

Moved to mainspace by UpTheOctave! (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 19:22, 6 December 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Hook fact is brilliant; you may get some kickback that the fact is in a dropquote, but I don't mind. It does need a reference in the running text per WP:DYKHFC. Earwig spots no issues. New enough, long enough, no image to review though the one in the lede does appear to be free. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:08, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review Chris Woodrich! I've added a reference after the relevant sentence in prose (and added a bit more detail while I had a good look at the source). UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 23:35, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Awesome. Looks good! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:41, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]