Talk:Serbia Must Not Stop

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Serbia Mid‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

People's Peasant Party

The article currently lists People's Peasant Party as one of the members. The trouble is the article says the party ceased to exist in 2010 whereas this article suggests the coalition was for the 2012 election only Nil Einne (talk) 03:23, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Political orientation?

This article really needs to say what the political orientation of this coalition is. Leftist? Centrist? Socialist? 75.73.176.26 (talk) 03:29, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that information is missing. An editor that can read Serbian could help in improving the article? HammerFilmFan (talk) 06:42, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Let's Get Serbia Moving. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:28, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Political positions of the block parties in For Our Children (Serbia) coalition

Are the parties in these coalition have different positions from Serbian Progressive Party? If these parties are subordinate to the leading party, These parties should be count as satellite parties.

5.102.239.11 (talk) 11:35, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Naming

The names in the lead do not match the current title - and the variant names need better explanation. I don't know what the "lists" in this article refer to. https://www.kosovo-online.com/en/news/serbian-elections/vucic-serbia-must-not-stop-list-received-742-votes-serbs-kosovo-17-12-2023 Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:57, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]