Jump to content

Talk:Shuah Khan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 talk 00:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Created by AbdulRahim2002 (talk). Moved to mainspace by TParis (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 51 past nominations.

paul2520 💬 13:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Linux Foundation Fellow Shuah Khan.
Linux Foundation Fellow Shuah Khan.


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.
Overall: I added the photo to the DYK template as per the suggestion above. The QPQ was done by nominator paul2520. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 20:00, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Notability for dummies

[edit]

I 100% agree with your overriding of the AfC declination. That was by an editor who I have noticed sometimes does AfC reviews outside their knowledge base, which is prone to error.

That said, I think the article could do with a little "notability for dummies" additions so people who have no clue about Linux understand better. Maybe mention what parts she manages in a way that non-experts understand? (I did not find awards, and her single publication looks weak.) Ldm1954 (talk) 19:25, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's also frustrating because we acknowledge as a project that there is a gender gap, and we acknowledge that part of our gender gap can be blamed on the fact that the media has a gender gap in coverage of women compared to men with the same accomplishments. But, yet, individual editors still don't register those personal and systematic biases when reviewing notability. It's frustrating. Then when a knowledgable person gets frustrated and lashes out, we are more concerned with civility than building an encyclopedia. It really makes this project sometimes feel like it's just a video game to new page patrollers and AFC patrollers where they are just trying to get points for whacking a mole (or woman).

Ack on your other comments. I'll see what I can do on another date next week.--v/r - TP 19:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I dont offhand see the sexism here, what I do see is two AFC patrollers who seem to know little about Linux reviewing where that is core. In an ideal world we would be able to limit the patrol topics of users, but that is probably unrealistic. More than once I have found myself reviewing patrol decisions by others within my core competency and tagging, or a couple of times draftifying. So it goes. Ldm1954 (talk) 20:50, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]