Talk:Southern Cross Tasmania

It looks like this page was copy/pasted from TNT-9 on January 2/3. I'll grab a copy of this page, delete it, do a proper page move, and replace the text in this article, in order to keep as much page history as possible. That's assuming that Southern Cross Tasmania is the preferred name for the article -- Chuq 05:10, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No it was basically all written by myself apart from the history which i got from a source i sound on google, i have just had a look at the TNT-9 page and it hasn't got half the information that this one has so if we want to move all the info to there or vice-versa i dont mind Thomass_28

I agree that it looks as though the information on the TNT-9 page has been C+P'd from here and expanded, and only one should remain. I too wonder what the standard for this is - as there are articles for Southern Cross Tasmania and now Southern Cross GTS/BKN, but TND-34 (which is now Southern Cross Darwin). -Spiky Sharkie [ talk ] 09:07, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Source of this has NOT been copied and pasted from Wikipedia, but a different source. I understand they are both the same, so i am unsure as to what is to happen to this article Thomass_28

Suggesting that it be merged with TNT-9 - and would suggest that "TNT-9" be the name of the merged article; from what I understand, the call sign is the preferred article title (see Talk:Seven Melbourne for a precedent). -Spiky Sharkie [ talk ] 13:57, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]