Talk:The Hard Road: Restrung

Australia: Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal The Hard Road: Restrung is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Hip-hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip-hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip-hopHip-hop
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Censored?

I bought album today from the Obese Records store, and the only version I got was Censored.
The cd cover didn't say anything about it being Censored. Anyone else get this?
RgNet 08:37, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got it on saturday and found the same thing. I really dislike censored stuff where they just distort the words because it sounds like a defect in the cd. downloaded a torrent, same thing. the version on itunes is listed as explicit but from the samples it is censored also. pretty lame if you ask me

Ah fair enough, I was hoping it wasn't just a censored copy that I had bought. But luckily thats not the case. I have sort of gotten used to listening to the censored version now. It's probably because its just a mix CD.

RgNet 15:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to one report I heard it was because they were working with the ASO and didn't want to cause offence, however supposedly they had nothing to worry about as the ASO's vocabulary streatched beyond their range...but by the time that they actually worked together with them it had all been recorded and what not. Maybe when the DVD comes out of the Adelaide concert (with the ASO) it'll have the original wording in it. --Tangerineduel 13:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Restrung Release cover.jpg

Image:Restrung Release cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:46, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]