Talk:The Proposal (2009 film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TriiipleThreat (talk · contribs) 19:41, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct:

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

Verifiable with no original research:

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

Overall good use of reliable sources, although the references in the Accolades section could be replaced with more reliable ones. This should be fairly easy.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:15, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(c) it contains no original research:

Broad in its coverage:

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic:

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

There does not seem to be enough fair-use rationale for File:Margaret Andrew.jpg to permit its use, in its current manner. I suggest the image be removed.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:25, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:08, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

Pass/Fail:

Overall fairly-well written concise article. See my comments regarding reliable sources and non-free images.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:25, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Should be good now. :) — DAP388 (talk) 23:53, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good work.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 00:15, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]