Talk:Training set
Appearance
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from Training_set was copied or moved into Test_set with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Robotics attention needed
[edit]- Refs needed
- Expand and check info
Chaosdruid (talk) 09:33, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Merge
[edit]There is absolutely no value added of having two articles Training set and Test set separately when neither can be discussed alone. The concept is Training and test sets with references to information science, statistics, data mining, biostatistics, robotics, etc. Currently the two articles are near duplicates (or could be based on the available information. Can we imagine some information for either which is not relevant for the other? Sda030 (talk) 22:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Totally agree with the suggestion - training set, testing set and validation set are all parts of one whole and should be presented in one topic. (MM-Professor of QM & MIS, WWU-USA)