Talk:Vanessa Z. Schneider

Vanessa Z. Schneider has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 21, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Video games: Characters Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Video game characters task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Atomas (0 participants)
PLAY: The Games Festival (1 participant)
FloodSim (1 participant)
Kunimitsu and Kunimitsu II (1 participant)
Blast Monkeys (0 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants)
Purple Francis (8 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (4 participants)
Dr. Wily (10 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (3 participants; relisted)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Vanessa Z. Schneider/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 22:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will try to get this one done in the coming days. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs)

Six Good Article Criteria

1. Prose is well written and is meeting guidelines.

2. There is no original research in the article, and everything is cited.

3. The subject is addressed in-depth from numerous sources in the article's Reception.

4. Article is neutral and does not attempt to take a stance on any particular topic.

5. Article appears stable. No controversial edits made in the past few days.

6. Article has two fair use media files, which have proper rationale guidelines.

Prose Review

Lead

-"She releases she's a clone" I assume this is meant to be realized?

Conception and design

-Nothing I can notice that's an issue here. Sourcing seems alright and properly cited.

Appearances

-Is the Aegis hyperlink necessary? I'm not sure if the two have any association.

Promotion and reception

-I feel the "hey she can dance quote" is unnecessary and can be summarized via prose.

-I feel the heavy emphasis on Gamesradar sources is a bit iffy. I personally see no problem with it, but I feel the emphasis on that many from one source may run afoul of other editors. I'd highly suggest either trimming a source or two off (Personally, I'd trim the one in the last paragraph and one of the three before it)

Overall

Article is overall very well written and has some very good sourcing. All this needs is a few touch-ups and it's good to go. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 23:12, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Let me know if there are any other issues, the gamesradar bit got trimmed but I feel the other two paragraphs are probably fine.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 23:46, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to go! Happy to pass this article. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 00:14, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]