Talk:Vietnamese Women's Museum

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Museums

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Vietnam

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The scandal information

@Bảo tàng Phụ Nữ Việt Nam: The scandal information has its reference of a newspaper, so it must be kept in the article. Please add more information if you have another newspaper saying the opposite, but keep the current scandal section. Tuanminh01 (talk) 11:37, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Tuanminh01: I'm having trouble understanding what the scandal is about. Would it be possible to clarify? I've also moved the scandal section to the history section because I don't think one incident requires its own section (WP:UNDUE). Airplaneman ✈ 19:25, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Airplaneman:The museum has rented its land to a cafeteria for 2 years before a decree was issued allowing it to do so. Regards, Tuanminh01 (talk) 02:51, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removing sourced content

Phuong Thu Hien, any reason why you are removing so much sourced content without an explanation? El_C 09:50, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]